| Author |
Message |
3jmj
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
|

Topic: SUPPRESSING CERTAIN DATA IN A COLUMN Posted: 11 May 2009 at 1:45pm |
|
I have a report that has 12 columns. I need help on suppressing the some datas in the 3 columns and not suppressing the whole line of the detail section. Example of my report:
f name l name address tel no. zipcode occupation working? wages john doe 123 quack xxx xxxxx postman no 12 jane saburit 789 doc xxx xxxxx stamper no 08 james bond 007 bondst 007 00007 agent yes 24
james wood 123 holly xxx xxxxx actor yes 24
brad pit 456 w holly xxx xxxxxx actor no 50 angelina jollie 888 w holly xxx xxxxxx actress no 50
my problem is just suppressing the first and or second lines but suppressing only the datas under columns zipcode, occupation and working? but not suppressing the whole detail line and leaving only the last lines with full data. Desired result should look like this:
f name l name address tel no. zipcode occupation working? wages
john doe 123 quack xxx 12
jane saburit 789 doc xxx 08
james bond 007 bondst 007 00007 agent yes 24
james wood 123 holly xxx xxxxx actor yes 24
brad pit 456 w holly xxx 50
angelina jollie 888 w holly xxx xxxxxx actress no 50
please help me attain this result, thank you 3jmj
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|
DBlank
Moderator
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9053
|

Posted: 11 May 2009 at 2:23pm |
You appear to be grouping on something here.
What is that?
or if not how are you determining the starting and points for the suppressions? e.g. why did you choose to suppress john doe and jane saburit and not james bond and then leave a space then not suppress for james wood.
Also is there a field that gives you some sort of maximim or order to the data in each group?
Understanding this would be important to helping with a solution.
Edited by DBlank - 11 May 2009 at 2:24pm
|
IP Logged |
|
3jmj
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 9:46am |
DATE: WRK CTR: JOB: OP NO: LOT: SETUP: HRS: VAR: RUNNING? %ACT TO STD: EARNE/LOSS
4/29/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 7.00 18.00 NO 28% 1080.0
4/30/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 1700 8.00 YES 68% 480.00
4/29/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 2.00 10.00 NO 17% 500.00
4/30/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 8.00 4.00 NO 67% 200.00
4/28/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 4.00 8.00 NO 33% 400.00
4/29/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 5.50 6.50 NO 46% 325.00
4/30/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 15.50 (3.50) YES 129% (175.00)
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 2.00 12.00 NO 14% 540.00
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 5.00 9.00 NO 36% 405.00
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Above this line is exactly how my report looks like. To answer your questions, I do have have groupings and they are wrk ctr, job, op no and lot. Regarding suppressing some fields, I only want to show the last line per group. You will notice that I did not include the employees, coz they are immaterial here. Per job can have different employees working on it per day. I need the rest of the information but some of the fields I don't want to show. I don't know if I am making myself clear. Using my report above, suppressing some fields, my report will look like this:
DATE: WRK CTR: JOB: OP NO: LOT: SETUP: HRS: VAR: RUNNING? %ACT TO STD: EARNE/LOSS
4/29/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 7.00
4/30/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 1700 8.00 YES 68% 480.00
4/29/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 2.00
4/30/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 8.00 4.00 NO 67% 200.00
4/28/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 4.00
4/29/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 5.50
4/30/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 15.50 (3.50) YES 129% (175.00)
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 2.00
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 5.00 9.00 NO 36% 405.00
PLEASE HELP
|
IP Logged |
|
DBlank
Moderator
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9053
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 9:59am |
You can conditionally suppress the last 4 fields. You may have to tweak this as I am not sure how your grouping is might effect it but here is a process.
Right click on the fied you want to suppress and select Format Field.
Click on the Common tab
Click on the formula button for "Suppress" and add this formula replacing the actual table and field name:
Next({table.job#field})={table.job#field}
Repeat for each of the fields.
|
IP Logged |
|
3jmj
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 11:49am |
I am getting an error stating:
"the remaining text does not appear to be part of the formula"
these are the formulas I tried but all gave me the same error:
next{LX.LX_MOSJOB}={LX.LX_MOSJOB}
all of the above i got the same errors, please help 
|
IP Logged |
|
DBlank
Moderator
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9053
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 11:57am |
you are only loooking to compare it the next job is the same as the current job not these other options. Change the {table.job#field}) to be whatever the item in red below is.
Next({table.job#field})={table.job#field}
DATE: WRK CTR: JOB: OP NO: LOT: SETUP: HRS: VAR: RUNNING? %ACT TO STD: EARNE/LOSS
4/29/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 7.00
4/30/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 1700 8.00 YES 68% 480.00 Edited by DBlank - 12 May 2009 at 11:58am
|
IP Logged |
|
3jmj
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 12:38pm |
i did what was told:
first I tried this:
right click on the job(red), format field, common tab, x-2 on suppress and typed the following formula "ext{LX.LX_MOSJOB}={LX.LX_MOSJOB}" (without the quotes) clicked checked formula, the result was "the remaining text does not appear to be part of the formula"
2nd tried this under column Variance, format field, common tab, x-2 on suppress and typed the following formula "ext{LX.LX_MOSJOB}={LX.LX_MOSJOB}" (without the quotes) clicked checked formula, the result was "the remaining text does not appear to be part of the formula"
3rd tried this also under column Running and format field, common tab, x-2 on suppress and typed the following formula "ext{LX.LX_MOSJOB}={LX.LX_MOSJOB}" (without the quotes) clicked checked formula, the result was "the remaining text does not appear to be part of the formula"
Please help, I am not sure if I am following correctly, please give me detail instructions where you want me put this formula? 
|
IP Logged |
|
DBlank
Moderator
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9053
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 1:08pm |
You are getting closer
Let me explain what we are trying to do here.
You only want the VAR: ,RUNNING? ,%ACT TO STD: and EARNE/LOSS fields to show on the last instance of rows per change on the lx_mosjob field.
SO you can compare one row to the next by using the NEXT() function. If the next row has the same lx_mosjob as the current row you want it to suppress.
The below formual goes in each of the 4 fields suppress condition.
NEXT({LX.LX_MOSJOB})={LX.LX_MOSJOB} Edited by DBlank - 12 May 2009 at 1:08pm
|
IP Logged |
|
3jmj
Newbie
Joined: 23 Apr 2009
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 1:44pm |
This is really great but the issue i am facing now is it is inconsistent. It is doing it on some but on some it will completely suppress the last line as well. Plesae help, how can we tell it to always leave the last line per group even if the detail line is 1 or 2 or 3 and so on. If it only has 1 detail line to leave it and don't suppress. At the moment its inconsistency is suppressing also the last line immaterial of how many detail lines it has.
Example:
DATE: WRK CTR: JOB: OP NO: LOT: SETUP: HRS: VAR: RUNNING? %ATO S: EARNED(LOSS)
4/29/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 7.00
4/30/09 1.110.01 0002141 10 001 25.00 1700 8.00 YES 68% 480.00
4/29/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 2.00
4/30/09 1.115.11 0002093 10 001 12.00 8.00
4/28/09 .115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 4.00
4/29/09 1.115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 5.50
4/30/09 .115.04 0001516 10 002 12.00 15.50
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 2.00
4/29/09 1.130.17 0001278 10 005 14.00 5.00 9.00 NO 36% 405.00
THIS IS WHAT I MEANT BY INICONSISTENCIES OF SUPPRESSING.....
|
IP Logged |
|
DBlank
Moderator
Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 9053
|

Posted: 12 May 2009 at 1:50pm |
In your sample data above is this showing me details rows or group footers with the details suppressed? also are you conditionally suppressing rows (or footers if that is what is being displayed) in any way? Edited by DBlank - 12 May 2009 at 1:50pm
|
IP Logged |
|
|
|